i'll deal with your book if you go take classes on chemistry, physics, anthropolgy, biology, and math. then you'll understand my arguments as to why your idea is outdated and intellectually dishonest.
I have. I'm a real life college graduate! Yay!
i'm not going to waste my time arguing the semantics of logic when your very position violates it fromthe get go.
Again, what was my position in quoting the book? That both atheists and theists use logical fallacies when dealing with each other. That was the entire point! But you have chased me around several threads for weeks (or months) and it seems that no matter what I say, rather be in hades has to disagree. This most recent disagreement was that because the book was written in 1996, it's points about the use of logical fallacies can be discredited. No argument about the actual content of what the book said. Instead you brought it on me that I don't understand the semantics of logic.
except there is evidence, you simply refuse to look at it.
And what evidence have I categorically refused to look at?
Again, there have been absolutely no specifics of anything that I have refused to look at in favor of staying in some sort of delusion. I stated that for some, there will never be enough proof of God. That's a fact. Short of Him appearing in the sky to say "I exist", there is very little that will convince an atheist of His existence. That's not intellectually dishonest. I'm not sure you understand just what intellectual honesty is, rather be in hades. You keep accusing me of being dishonest, and it's not clear where that is coming from. There was a JW apologist recently that was accusing everyone (including jwfacts.com) of being intellectually dishonest, and it became clear that he did not understand the term. I'm wondering the same from you.
If someone came to you arguing that 1+1 = 5, and refused to look at you holding up one finger, and then another finger showing two fingers instead of 5, at some point even the hardiest of people would get irritated.
Again, another fallacy. Comparing my belief in a cause of the effect (i.e a creator) to not understanding math.
I am happy though that you are bored and have contributed so much to these threads. It has provided a wealth of examples of an atheists use of logical fallacies. Believers do it all the time. And they show up on many threads. I'm glad you have taken the time to contribute to the other side and show that some atheists do the same. Well done!
